Art of Climbing Trees

A Book for Aspiring Eutopians

Transition / Eutopia Greenprint Open-Source Beta Version 01

Environmental Audit for Transition (EAT)

This will be an ongoing participatory, transparent (i.e. with a chain of accountability), open-source, audit of civilisation/human activity, human skills and energy, the biosphere and non-living materials/resources207. Much of this has already been done, but it needs to be collated through the lens of transition. This will be something like world citizens putting on the Parallel Thinking White (Information) Hat195 to illuminate what we know, giving us a solid foundation of reality.ย 

This will quantify environmental health โ€“ the health or degradation of the biosphere, the needs of each species pertaining to habitat and healthy sustenance/food chains. Also, current human production, infrastructure including private property, the available renewable power, plus the available kilojoules of human/animal/machine energy. The EAT summarises what we have to work with.

The world is the commons. The Tragedy of the Commons57 is only avoided by communication, which is the primary function of the United Earth polycentric forums and assemblies. The EAT aims to present reality so the UE (all of us) can make good decisions, understand the economyโ€™s true nature (prioritising the objective over the subjective), and pragmatically manage the transformation of resources cleverly and with empathy57. (The new economy has nothing to do with creating or chasing money, and GDP is abandoned as a measure of success199).

The first lesson from the EAT will be to accept that we have absolutely no choice but to reduce energy-intensive and extractive activities (if we wish to survive) and to accept weโ€™ve been โ€˜energy blindโ€™. We must transition to using only the clean energy we have available, and no more โ€“ to usher in a FREEconomy107. This is largely a matter of transitioning our expectations, which will involve weaning ourselves off our addictions181. Despite a significant reduction in production/consumption โ€“ degrowing the economy, or causing a โ€˜great simplificationโ€™ to something โ€˜leanerโ€™172 โ€“ it wonโ€™t have us going โ€˜back to the dark ageโ€™, as the clichรฉ would have us fear*. (The life of muddy boil-faced toil and drudgery of yesteryear were also primarily caused by inequality and corrupted power, just as it is today. Poverty and squalor are the other side of the gold coin.) It remains a choice between degrowth by disaster or by our design.ย 

* I would trade the comfort and gadgets of modern civilisation thatโ€™s killing everything in exchange for a life in the Stone Age. However, research outlined in the paper Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario shows even ten billion humans can live with a 1960s level of energy consumption. (Everyone likes the 60s, donโ€™t they?) Their research scenario relies on โ€˜Advanced technology, a reduction in demand to sufficiency levels [however], sufficiency is more materially generous than opponents assume.โ€™

Please try using the (efficient) โ€˜Six Thinking Hatsโ€™ method of parallel thinking for sharing your ideas.
It helps us to organise our thoughts and feelings. Wear the Black Hat for critisism/doubts; the Green hat for creative suggestions; the Yellow for positive responses, Red for gut feelings; White for information. I am wearing the Blue Hat now, when I say we are here to design Eutopia.

Simply write โ€˜Blackโ€™, โ€˜Yellowโ€™, โ€˜Greenโ€™, etc, before your given response. Then, start a new paragraph for ideas of a different coloured hat.

Add Suggestion / Improvements

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *